Five years after starting his first job with a landscaping crew in the suburbs of Seattle, Fredi Dubon decided he had enough and called it quits. The work days were long, sometimes 12 hours, but a bigger problem was having to inhale exhaust from his gas-powered leaf blower.
The fumes tended to be harshest in the cool mornings or when he ran his aging machine in the narrow yards of condo buildings. Eventually Dubon, a 28-year-old immigrant from El Salvador, said he was getting migraine headaches “pretty much every day,” a problem that both he and a doctor who examined him attributed to the exhaust belched by the blower.
Yet the headaches that Dubon suffered – until he joined a landscaping company that used electric machines – provide only a whiff of the possible hazards from gasoline-fired lawn and garden equipment.
California’s approval of tightened air quality regulations, campaigns for leaf blower bans by local activists around the country, and resolutions passed by the state medical societies of New York and Massachusetts highlighting health risks are beginning to draw more attention to the issue. At the same time, landscaping equipment manufacturers once accused of resisting a shift to electric machines, and that still push back against environmental regulations, are offering more of the so-called zero-emissions options.
Scant research exists on the potential health impact of emissions from the millions of gas-powered leaf blowers, lawn mowers, trimmers and related equipment now in use. Yet, despite improvements, these machines still emit toxic contaminants such as carcinogenic benzene as well as surprisingly large amounts of other smog-forming chemicals.
Fredi Dubon blamed his daily migraine headaches on fumes from the gas-powered leaf blowers he used in his landscaping work.
In fact, according to estimates by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, emissions of smog-producing substances from mowers, blowers and other small off-road engines last year were 81 percent as high as the amount from standard sedans. In the air pollution-plagued Los Angeles area, the small off-road engines category is projected to overtake cars as a contributor to smog around 2020.
Perhaps most worrisome, the gas engines release high concentrations of microscopic ultrafine particles, as recently confirmed in tests commissioned by FairWarning. Ultrafine particles are unregulated, but scientists increasingly believe they are a serious danger. That threat is particularly true for landscaping workers, but also a potential concern for other adults and children who are exposed. Ultrafine particles are 0.1 of a micron, or roughly one-thousandth the width of a human hair.
“The basic idea is that the smaller the particle, the deeper it can be inhaled into the lungs, and the more potential it has then to cause health problems” such as lung cancer, heart disease, strokes, asthma and other respiratory ailments, said Jo Kay Ghosh, an epidemiologist and the health effects officer for the South Coast Air Quality Management District, a pollution control agency covering much of smoggy Southern California. Ultrafine particles also can pass through cell membranes and slip into the bloodstream.
Unpublished, preliminary research by California regulators last year underscored such concerns. The California Air Resources Board’s limited testing, which is being followed up with a more formal study, suggested that the equipment operators were exposed to at least 10 times more ultrafine particles than if they were standing beside a busy roadway.
also published by:
McClatchy DC
Miami Herald
The Kansas City Star
The Sacramento Bee
Salon
Fort Worth Star-Telegram
The Charlotte Observer
The Raleigh News & Observer
The Durham Herald-Sun
The Wichita Eagle
Idaho Statesman
The Fresno Bee
The Modesto Bee
The San Luis Obispo Tribune
Merced (Calif.) Sun-Star
The News Tribune (Tacoma, Wash.)
The Bellingham (Wash.) Herald
The Olympian (Olympia, Wash)
Tri-City Herald (Kennewick, Wash.)
The Register-Guard (Eugene, Ore.)
Leader-Telegram (Eau Claire, Wis.)
La Crosse (Wis.) Tribune
Sun Herald (Biloxi-Gulfport, Miss.)
Belleville (Ill.) News-Democrat
Lexington (Ky.) Herald-Leader
The Telegraph (Macon, Ga.)
Ledger-Enquirer (Columbus, Ga.)
Bradenton (Fla.) Herald
The State (Columbia, S.C.)
The Hilton Head (S.C.)Island Packet
The Herald (Rock Hill, S.C.)
The Sun News (Myrtle Beach, S.C.)
Industrial Safety & Hygiene News
Greenfield (Mass.) Recorder
The Seattle Globalist
Wasau (Wis.) Pilot & Review
For workers who earn their living operating such equipment, “This is extremely alarming,” said Michael T. Benjamin, chief of the board’s monitoring and laboratory division, at a hearing last November.
More recent testing conducted by a consulting firm for FairWarning, involving six workers who were monitored while using 16 pieces of gas-powered equipment, detected even more dramatic surges of ultrafine particles. In one instance, ultrafine particle levels around an 11-year-old leaf blower were 50 times higher than at a nearby clogged intersection at rush hour. In the same round of tests, with a 2017 model leaf blower, the ultrafine particle level was more than 40 times higher than at the busy intersection.
Rima Habre, an environmental health expert at the University of Southern California medical school, said landscaping workers are particularly at risk because they commonly put in long days toiling very close to these sources of potentially dangerous emissions. In addition, because the workers physically exert themselves while they perform their jobs, they are likely to breathe harder and inhale more contaminated air deeper into the lungs. “All together, that means they get a much higher exposure and inhaled dose than the rest of us,” Habre said.
Standard, disposable “N95” masks or respirators available at hardware stores can provide protection against exhaust particles – if they are fitted properly, which isn’t always easy. It takes more specialized respirators to filter out gases such as benzene. But due to cost, discomfort and lack of information, many workers don’t get any kind of respiratory protection.
The air pollution puts yet another burden on the nation’s roughly 1 million landscaping workers, who frequently are low-income immigrants with few job alternatives. They also often endure intense leaf blower noise, which a Centers for Disease Control report this year said can cause permanent hearing loss.
Aside from possible hazards to landscaping workers, the gas-powered equipment pollutes the air breathed by everyone. That factor spurred the California Air Resources Board, a national leader in air quality regulation, last November to approve tighter requirements for mowers, blowers, chainsaws and other small off-road engines, with a broader round of restrictions expected within a few years.
The small off-road engines category is giving the auto a run for its money as a source of emissions that lead to smog, in part because cars burn gasoline much more cleanly than they once did. In one comparison, California officials say the contamination from running a top-selling leaf blower just one hour matches the emissions from driving a 2016 Toyota Camry for 1,100 miles, the distance from Los Angeles to Denver. The pollutants in the leaf blower-versus-car comparisons are oxides of nitrogen and reactive organic gases.
Subscribe to receive occasional alerts in your inbox
Michael T. Benjamin, a California air quality official, said a preliminary state test found that landscaping workers could be getting “extremely alarming” exposure to ultrafine particles.
“You think about how much focus there is on reducing emissions from cars, and rightfully so, but how little we focused on these engines,” said Bill Magavern, policy director for the Coalition for Clean Air, a California-based advocacy group. Magavern called the emissions comparisons “stunning” and added, “It just, to me, shows why we really need to pay a lot more attention to reducing emissions from this sector.”
California first approved emissions regulations on small off-road engines in 1990, and the rules have been expanded and strengthened since then. The federal EPA, in turn, generally has followed California’s lead.
The emissions regulations, though, sometimes have been ineffective. In fact, the tightened testing and enforcement rules unanimously approved by the Air Resources Board last November were prompted by spot checks showing that more than half of the machines failed to meet California air quality standards.
The lawn and garden equipment manufacturing industry, which last year had estimated wholesale sales in the U.S. approaching $11 billion, has a track record of fighting hard to fend off regulation. A high-profile battle erupted in 2003 when Briggs & Stratton – which describes itself as the world’s largest producer of gasoline engines for outdoor power equipment – unsuccessfully tried to thwart a new round of rules adopted later that year in California. The company persuaded Kit Bond, then a U.S. senator from Missouri, to push an amendment intended to strip California and other states of the ability to adopt air quality standards tougher than the federal rules for small off-road engines. Bond said he was trying to save jobs at Briggs & Stratton plants in his state.
California lawmakers resisted, and eventually a compromise was reached leaving California’s authority intact but barring other states from adopting tougher-than-federal standards. And now, given that no one expects the Trump administration to take new steps to reduce air pollution around the country, “you’ve got a situation where even though California can move ahead legally and adopt some standards that pertain to California, the rest of the country is basically shit out of luck,” said Frank O’Donnell, president of the Washington, D.C., nonprofit group, Clean Air Watch.
Greg Knott, vice president of the Outdoor Power Equipment Institute, requesting a delay in new California emissions rules. In June, he sent a letter accusing California officials of a “failure to address the true costs” of the tougher rules.
Both Briggs & Stratton and the Outdoor Power Equipment Institute, which supported the company’s effort and is the industry’s main trade group, declined to be interviewed for this story. But the institute has taken the lead in trying to thwart the latest California rules. It submitted a 101-page filing loaded with objections to the proposals before they were approved, and then in June fired off another 12-page letter in a late effort to stop the regulations, which are due to take effect in January.
In the June letter, the industry group accused the California agency’s staff of a “failure to address the true costs” of the tougher rules. It also asserted that the flaw “will result in the rule being invalidated” by California’s Office of Administrative Law “or possibly by a court,” suggesting that the industry is prepared to sue California to derail the regulations.
When it comes to leaf blowers, local governments have been an intense regulatory battlefront. A nonprofit group, Quiet Communities Inc. says nearly 140 communities around the country over the years have imposed bans or restrictions that apply to noise from leaf blowers. Their buzzing has riled up many a cozy suburb – but air quality and public health also are at issue.
Even so, left blowers remain a hot retail item. More than 4 million are estimated to have been sold in the U.S. last year, despite the community activists and environmentalists who consider the machines needless nuisances. “Some of this equipment, let’s face it, is not really all that necessary. We got along fine before we had leaf blowers,” said Magavern of the Coalition for Clean Air.
Jamie Banks, a medical economics researcher with graduate degrees from schools including MIT and Dartmouth, founded Quiet Communities four years ago after the noise from landscaping equipment shattered her sense of peace while working from home in the town of Lincoln, Mass., near Walden Pond. “It went on for hours every day,” said Banks. “The air would smell like gasoline.”
For many homeowners and landscapers, though, leaf blowers are regarded as essential time-saving tools. Landscaping firm owners assert that the machines enable them to keep customers’ yards tidy at a reasonable price. Faith Michaels, a landscaping firm owner in Brookline, Mass., who has been a leader in fighting restrictions on the machines in her community, says leaf blowers also benefit her employees. “If we had all our people raking, we’d have a lot of back injuries,” she said.
The report commissioned by FairWarning on emissions from leaf blowers and other gas-powered equipment is available here.
Nationally, the leading voice in defending the leaf blower and in trying to swat down pollution and noise concerns is Larry Will, a retired vice president of engineering, and now a paid consultant, for equipment maker Echo Inc. He said he also did some work previously for the Outdoor Power Equipment Institute. Will, who oversaw the development of a quieter leaf blower at Echo before leaving his job as a company executive in 2002, points out on his website, leafblowernoise.com, that he has been quoted by such prominent journalism outlets as The New Yorker, The Atlantic and CBS News. He told CBS on camera in 2011 that critics who raise health arguments against leaf blowers were “grasping at straws, if you will, because it’s not true.”
In an interview with FairWarning, Will said: “Has anyone died from a leaf blower? Has anyone even gotten sick from a leaf blower? … Don’t expect me to tell you that leaf blower emissions is bad, because it isn’t. It’s acceptable to the EPA, the governing body that tells us what it should be.”
As part of his regular routine, Will monitors news from around the country about anti-leaf blower laws, and by his own account has contacted about 160 local and state government entities to give his side of the story. Although he sometimes describes himself as a “consultant” for those governmental bodies, he acknowledged that he is paid only by Echo.
Critics say he tries to talk communities out of leaf blower bans with misleading statements and half-truths. “There are reasons why the American Lung Association and the EPA have written about this as a source of emissions, and yet he will claim that this is not an issue,” Banks said.
On his “Leaf Blower Facts” web page, Will states that he has “never found any test data or reputable report, which shows that leaf blowers cause any kind of illness. This is confirmed by the California Air Resources Board in their report to the State Legislature, which was compiled by Dr. Nancy Steele.”
In that year 2000 review of research available at the time, Steele did in fact state that “there have been no dose-response studies related to emissions from leaf blowers and we do not know how many people are affected by those emissions.” (Even today, there is no published research specifically on potential risks from leaf blower emissions, and public health authorities have been left to draw their own conclusions from related research.)
Yet Steele also wrote that “potential health effects from exhaust emissions, fugitive dust, and noise range from mild to serious.” Further, she said, “Some toxic compounds in gasoline exhaust, in particular benzene, 1,3-butadiene, acetaldehyde, and formaldehyde, are carcinogens.”
Landscaping workers commonly say they feel the effects of breathing exhaust from gas-powered machines. The issue helped spur Dubon, the Seattle-area worker who complained of headaches from leaf blower fumes, to begin leading job safety workshops last year for Casa Latina, a nonprofit day labor center and advocacy organization.
Some of the workers Dubon meets who use gas-powered equipment, he said, tell him “they feel dizzy or nauseous” after operating the machines. A worker who was part of a group Dubon met with in April, Alexander Blanco, related how exhaust streaming from his mower after a long day of cutting lawns could make his eyes water and his body feel tired.
Yet landscaping workers often are resigned to the fumes as well as to the noise and vibrations from their gas-powered machines. “You know you need to earn money and you have to work,” said Sergio Maldonado, a 35-year-old Guatemalan immigrant who has done landscaping in Miami for 18 years.
He added: “If you don’t do it, and you’re working for another person, they’ll fire you, and then who is going to bring home food?”
Maldonado now is in business for himself. But in the years he spent working for other landscape maintenance firms, none of his employers ever provided safety gear like masks, glasses or gloves – and he couldn’t afford to get them himself. “You start buying those things, plus breakfast, snack, lunch and dinner and that kind of stuff, the money you earn wouldn’t be enough for you.”
Besides, Maldonado said, doing something like wearing a mask would have provoked his bosses and others on his crew to make fun of him. Now, he simply wears a rag over his mouth to provide relief from the fumes. Maldonado also avoids wearing earmuffs for noise protection, because they distort his sense of what’s going on around him.
On the other hand, Richard Valenzuela, a lead grounds maintenance worker at California State University, Los Angeles, says he usually uses a mask to avoid inhaling dust, and that some of his younger co-workers increasingly are doing the same. Valenzuela said he doesn’t always notice the exhaust from his gas-powered machines while he is focused on his work. But, he said, “At the end of the day, you go home and you can smell it on your clothes, on your T-shirt. I’ve got to put my clothes outside every day when I get home.” Valenzuela said he is thankful that the university has begun phasing out the gas machines and is switching to electric equipment. “It’s really going to be a benefit for us,” he said. “That stuff goes straight to your lungs.”
Richard Valenzuela, a university grounds worker, is thankful his campus is phasing out gas-powered machines. The exhaust, he said, “goes straight to your lungs.” (Photo by J. Emilio Flores, California State University, Los Angeles.)
Electric lawn and garden machines – both corded models and battery-powered gear – are gaining acceptance around the country. According to the market research firm The Freedonia Group, electric machines accounted for 47 percent of manufacturers’ $438 million in U.S. sales last year of leaf blowers.
Although most of the electric equipment is being bought by homeowners, institutions such as Cal State LA and commercial landscaping companies are a big part of the market, too. The nation’s largest commercial landscaping company, BrightView, this year began equipping some of its crews with electric mowers, blowers, trimmers and edgers as part of a pilot program. The company said the move was a response to “growing trends and customer requests’ for zero-emission, low-noise equipment.”
Battery-powered machines are narrowing the gap in performance with gas-powered devices, and they offer flexibility that corded electric equipment can’t match. But short battery life – they rarely run more than an hour – and the time it takes to recharge continue to slow acceptance among professional landscaping firms. “Time is money for them,” said Gerry Barnaby, a spokesman for Ego, a leading brand of battery-powered equipment. A major shift to electric equipment by landscapers, he said, likely will require further improvements in battery technology. He explained: “They can’t necessarily plug in everywhere they go.”
That, however, hasn’t stopped environmental officials and activists from trying to speed the switchover to electric equipment. In such states as California, Utah and Pennsylvania, local agencies have offered exchange programs that give equipment owners financial incentives to turn in their gas-powered machines and replace them with electric gear. “That’s really the future,” said Diane Takvorian, who sits on the California Air Resources Board, referring to electric machines.
In the meantime, she is concerned about the “huge air quality issues” posed by the gas-powered machines. Takvorian, who is also the executive director of an advocacy group called the Environmental Health Coalition, is particularly focused on the potential harm to landscaping workers. “These guys are out there every day, all day,” she said.
FairWarning thanks the Fund for Investigative Journalism for a grant that supported our work on this story. 
Given the pandemic we are consumed with does not your research suggest immediate regulation and enforcement of gas powered leaf blowers is essential. As we shelter in place and establish social distancing these blowers are spraying particles exactly what we are trying to avoid. How do we get this issue on the table. .?
As gas-powered Leaf blowers and Lawnmowers emit toxic like carcinogenic benzene. I think it will more safe to use cordless/ battery operated leaf blower
Gas leaf blowers, I get it next door 6 days a week from 7:30 A.M
I have complained to the facility La Crescenta chateau, they say we must keep it clean, it is maddening, the Police will not come out, the city won’t do anything.
can they be taken to court for the toxic fumes and noise disturbance on a daily basis that’s about all I have left to try to have this stopped everyday
It slowly drives you mad.
Thank you for listening.
Must move to get away from it.
Very sad.
Nobody is heeding the California laws. I encounter at least 5 leaf blowers on my daily walks. Their emissions cause cancer and I am forced to breathe them in. I feel completely powerless that nothing is being done about it.
They’re horrible. Noisy, polluting, they kill the insects and birds abandon their nests. They need to be banned.
[…] Another myth is that landscaping is a great job for the working man, but on the contrary, the landscaping industry takes advantage of vulnerable workers. Immigrant laborers carry these machines on their backs for up to 12 hours a day. Given the 115 decibel noise level, their hearing will be severely damaged. Only the best ear protection would shield them and usually they wear none. They also breathe the toxic exhaust fumes which will cause COPD or lung cancer. (Read about one worker here: https://www.fairwarning.org/2017/09/leaf-blower/) […]
Leaf blowers depend on a model of gardening in which the garden is like a Formica countertop to be wiped clean and shiny. Humans treat the ecosystems in their yard as if they are household appliances or automobiles clean it until it shines. The garden is an “object” instead of the organic system. A person who buys a leaf blower is buying into this erroneous ideal and in doing so they are distorting their ability to see the world as it really is: a world of autumn leaves, beneficial insects, living soil, decomposing compost, seedlings and trees that drop their leaves all over the lawn, every year. This is the way nature has been working for millions of years with deciduous trees and now we have a loud polluting machine working overtime to try to make it appear it’s not happening.
Adapted from Buddism and Leaf Blowers by Will Tuladhar-Douglas
http://blogs.dickinson.edu/buddhistethics/files/2010/05/tuladhar-article.pdf
https://www.fairwarning.org/2017/09/leaf-blower/
http://www.startribune.com/would-that-those-noxious-leaf-blowers-go-the-way-of-the-dodo/484354641/
Let me talk about what my little town of Old Tappan, New Jersey has become in the 21st Century. A generation ago it was quiet and peaceful. Today it’s become Right Wing Authoritarian Trump For President Upper Crust ElitistVille.
Lawn service alone is a joke for these Masters.
It’s like something out of The Three Stooges.
Ever hear of buying a cannon to swat a fly? Here’s the real-life story…
Neighbors who have 12’x12′ front lawns (some slightly more, some slightly less) hiring professional landscapers to manicure their lawns every week. A 10-minute job easily done with a push mower maybe once or twice a month becomes a noisy, weekly Event.
It’s a team of 3 to 6 people on average. They park their trailer on the side of the road, set up cones, and leap out with their wonderfully colorful neon yellow vests.
(This indicates they’re Hired Working Class as opposed to vandals or vagrants–Very Important in Modern America! Otherwise the police would be called!)
They strap on noisy diesel-powered backpack gear to blow a handful of leaves around. One following the other so not one leaf is missed. This is very important. Despite the fact that after they leave a gust of wind picks up and blows the leaves they’ve spent the past hour blowing right back where they originally were!
The other stooge gets out a ride-around lawn mower nearly the size of a volkswagon.
It nearly covers parts of peoples’ lawns in itself.
He mounts it and drives around and around and around on the grass for an hour or so until he knows its cut. There might even be a second guy behind him riding a backup mower Just In Case a few strands are missed.
All this can go on for a couple hours time.
It’s Noisy. It’s annoying. It burns up gasoline. It pumps fumes around.
The end result lawn also incorporates lots of fertilizers, insecticides–poisons–into the non-natural green grass which needs also to be watered constantly. It proves nothing but death. Pets develop cancer if they spend time on these fields. It kills wildlife. It’s only function is to Prove Something to those who see it. Idiot American are programmed to believe that it represents prosperity, cleanliness, and who-knows-what-else. To me it’s a massive drain on resources and a waste of money. Even more so if the lawn is located in drought regions where water is far better spent elsewhere. Like on crops.
They have this done because their neighbor does it and his neighbor does it and his neighbor does it. Leading all the way back to the first McMansion the block.
The logic is simple: “If our neighbor can afford to have professional lawn service then so can we. If they can have it done once a week then so can we.” In other words, it’s all about status not practicality.
They would not be caught dead performing the work of Peasants. Simple as that.
Rather, they are playing the role of English lords.
The manicured lawn is an extension of their McMansion, which is also a parallel extension of their luxury car collection (Always parked outdoors, never garaged!), and in turn is a materialistic extension of their tiny penises. They are, after all, White folks.
21st Century Americans only care about image not substance; about keeping up with the s5 Comments
A 2ND COMMENT: THE AMOUNT OF LAWN CARE AND POLLUTION DEPENDS ON WHAT YOU CALL A LAWN. I CUT MINE FROM 6″ TO 3.5″ EVERY 8 WEEKS AND AERATE IT ONCE A YEAR, AND MULCH THE LEAVES . MY HIGH GRASS NEEDS NO WATER. SOME CUT THEIR LAWN 2X/WEEK, POISON IT, AND BLOW THE LEAVES. THEN EVERY WEEK THEY WEED WACK THE GRASS WHERE IT MEETS THE SIDEWALK TO A PERPENDICULAR EDGE. THEN THEY BLOW THE DUST OFF THE SIDEWALK & ETC. THEY COULD EASILY BLOW THE GRASS ON THE LAWN AS THEY CUT BUT NO THEY BLOW TO THE OUTSIDE ON THE SIDEWALK ONLY TO BLOW IT BACK ON THE LAWN WITH THE BLOWER. THEY COULD LEAVE THE CUT GRASS ON THE LAWN AS FERTILIZER BUT INSTEAD THEY BLOW THAT.
REGARDS THE EQUIPMENT THEY USE IT IS NOT ONLY MORE POLLUTING BUT OFTEN LESS EFFICIENT. IN MY DAY THEY SOLD SOMETHING CALLED AN EDGER TRIMMER. IT WAS AN 8″ WIDE REEL MOWER WITH AN OPEN SIDE FOR TRIMMING JUST AS EFFICIENT FOR MOST USES AS A WHIP. REGARDS CLICKETY CLACK TREE TRIMMERS ONE CAN FREQUENTLY USE A HAND SCYTHE WHICH IS FASTER.
AT ANY RATE MY LAWN LOOKS THE SAME AS THEIRS IF NOT BETTER. FOR ONE THING IT DOESN’T GO BROWN.
MY SIDE EFFECTS ARE ESSENTIALLY ZERO.
THE FOLLOWING IS A CHEAP REEL MOWER MODIFICATION THAT LETS ME CUT MY 6″ HIGH GRASS WITHOUT GAS OR ELECTRICITY:. enter tom d sherman on fb* there you’ll see a $5 modification i made to a standard reel that you can make that will raise the cutting height in some cases as high as 9″. this will greatly increase the mower’s speed and allows you to wait months between mowing and not have to mow each week. its free. all you need is either a turnbuckle or cam, and some cord.
* https://www.facebook.com/PLEASENONOISE/ is my fb url. after doing this scroll to section beginning start “the modified reel mower …”
I’M QUOTING THIS FROM SOME OTHER:
Let me talk about what my little town of Old Tappan, New Jersey has become in the 21st Century. A generation ago it was quiet and peaceful. Today it’s become Right Wing Authoritarian Trump For President Upper Crust ElitistVille.
Lawn service alone is a joke for these Masters.
It’s like something out of The Three Stooges.
Ever hear of buying a cannon to swat a fly? Here’s the real-life story…
Neighbors who have 12’x12′ front lawns (some slightly more, some slightly less) hiring professional landscapers to manicure their lawns every week. A 10-minute job easily done with a push mower maybe once or twice a month becomes a noisy, weekly Event.
It’s a team of 3 to 6 people on average. They park their trailer on the side of the road, set up cones, and leap out with their wonderfully colorful neon yellow vests.
(This indicates they’re Hired Working Class as opposed to vandals or vagrants–Very Important in Modern America! Otherwise the police would be called!)
They strap on noisy diesel-powered backpack gear to blow a handful of leaves around. One following the other so not one leaf is missed. This is very important. Despite the fact that after they leave a gust of wind picks up and blows the leaves they’ve spent the past hour blowing right back where they originally were!
The other stooge gets out a ride-around lawn mower nearly the size of a volkswagon.
It nearly covers parts of peoples’ lawns in itself.
He mounts it and drives around and around and around on the grass for an hour or so until he knows its cut. There might even be a second guy behind him riding a backup mower Just In Case a few strands are missed.
All this can go on for a couple hours time.
It’s Noisy. It’s annoying. It burns up gasoline. It pumps fumes around.
The end result lawn also incorporates lots of fertilizers, insecticides–poisons–into the non-natural green grass which needs also to be watered constantly. It proves nothing but death. Pets develop cancer if they spend time on these fields. It kills wildlife. It’s only function is to Prove Something to those who see it. Idiot American are programmed to believe that it represents prosperity, cleanliness, and who-knows-what-else. To me it’s a massive drain on resources and a waste of money. Even more so if the lawn is located in drought regions where water is far better spent elsewhere. Like on crops.
They have this done because their neighbor does it and his neighbor does it and his neighbor does it. Leading all the way back to the first McMansion the block.
The logic is simple: “If our neighbor can afford to have professional lawn service then so can we. If they can have it done once a week then so can we.” In other words, it’s all about status not practicality.
They would not be caught dead performing the work of Peasants. Simple as that.
Rather, they are playing the role of English lords.
The manicured lawn is an extension of their McMansion, which is also a parallel extension of their luxury car collection (Always parked outdoors, never garaged!), and in turn is a materialistic extension of their tiny penises. They are, after all, White folks.
21st Century Americans only care about image not substance; about keeping up with the s5 Comments
One angle that’s not being considered anywhere, but could prove pivotal in the fight to get blowers banned is this: THE CRUELTY AND HARMS TO WILDLIFE BY BLOWER NOISE AND 200mph WIND-SPEEDS IS HORRIFYING. Hedgehogs and birds are being frightened away. Their habitats are destroyed. Creatures unable to escape are maimed or killed by blower winds.
However, no wildlife organization has yet spoken out about this, despite being asked to. The usual reply: “We are unaware of any problem.”
If you are aware blower fumes are poisoning pollinators, the noise wakes hibernators, and have witnessed for yourself blower annihilation to those hidden, earthy places under bushes or in long grasses and under logs, where bugs and other food sources for birds live, and where voles, moles, frogs, hedgehogs, ground-nesting birds and other small mammals live too, PLEASE TELL THE APPROPRIATE CONSERVATION GROUP(S) FOR THOSE ANIMALS WHOSE WELFARE YOU ABOUT, WHAT BLOWERS ARE DOING TO THEM.
We need to get wildlife and bird protection groups onside ASAP. Please contact them.
in most mowing situations all they have to do is position their mowers to blow the grass to the inside rather that the opposite way on the sidewalk. the lawn crew ,KIA of milwaukee to give it a name, in the fall blew the leaves out of the roof gutter in the two story condo across from the street from me. there weren’t any i could see, next spring they did the same thing! most lawn services don’t know anything about lawn care. anyway i say ban lawns.
In my neighborhood, don’t expect to be able to enjoy a beautiful day. You can’t open your windows, sit on your porch, do a little gardening or enjoy your own property because of the non-stop leaf blowing landscaping crews. The noise is intolerable. The next leaf blower is always waiting to rev up and destroy your day. I can’t work from home! I can’t think due to the leaf blowers’ racket reverberating through my house. Friends in the neighborhood have told me when they attempt to work from home they have to take conference calls in the bathroom or closet in order to hear themselves think over the leaf blowers outside. We pay $17,000 a year in property taxes, but we’re unable to quietly work in our own home during the day. We have horrible traffic in Atlanta, you would think the city would encourage working from home.
If I were constantly playing loud music at deafening decibels, the neighbors would call the police. So why is the neighbor or landscaper allowed to make deafening noise on a daily basis?
I never get my car washed because of leafblower filth in the air. As soon as I return home with a clean car, it gets covered in leaf dust. Nearly every peaceful day is disrupted by the spine scraping noise of those violent machines. As soon as I hear the noise, I smell the gasoline fumes.
There are things people can do. In most places it is illegal to dump your yard waste into the street, yet this is how these machines are used, which goes into how long the worker will take to usher every leaf, twig and dog turd to the curb for the grand dump. What you can do is take videos of them with your phone, showing the illegal leafblower dumping. You’ll often record the workers blowing it all down the storm drains. Send your videos to your water system authorities, your city council representative, and to the management of any public buildings where this egregious practice is taking place, such as libraries, hospitals and court houses.
In my experience, what will happen is that notices are sent to the addresses where this goes on, and things will improve for a while. The workers will spend less time getting every speck off the lawn, and just blow the debris onto the grass and planted beds as compost, and leave. But the improvement never lasts long. There is an OCD quality to the process, and before long the workers will lapse into their usual moronic behavior of blowing for 45 minutes, then dumping it in the street. You have to keep making the videos, keep going, keep sending to the authorities. Only when the dumping becomes a ticketable offense will it stop for good.
We all have to write or email our local, state and national environmental authorities, continuously. Passivity indicates acceptance. It may take a long time to get it stopped, because blowing is the popular job, and as this article mentions, the making of the machines is profitable, but if we don’t do anything, it will only get worse. If there are three buildings on your block where blowers are used now, next year there will be five. Contractors are now blowing at night in commercial areas such as malls. Blowers are used on weekends and holidays. Disturbing the peace is allowed because it is accepted. The environmental destruction is allowed because it is accepted. Don’t accept it.
Any time you are cleaning (sweeping, vacuuming, leaf removing – by raking or leaf blowing), you disturb what is on the ground outside (or on the floor inside) you will temporarily increase the airborne concentration of particles. The duration of the elevated concentration depends on particle size, wind, air moisture levels, and total concentrations. The background level (e.g., traffic-related) must be subtracted from the measured concentrations to determine the concentration attributable to the leaf blower.
Kiss my lawn care providing ass. You people have no clue how useful a leaf blower truly is. You stand here and complain but I bet you drive a car and use plenty of pollutants in your daily life.
There is lots of power machinery that is more dangerous than leaf blowers, but most of it does something useful. The unique thing about leaf blowing is that most of it is simply to make things look temporarily neat. The leaves are simply blown somewhere else, rather than disposed of or composted, at the cost of the user’s health and aural distress to everybody else. I support banning leaf blowers, regardless of the power source, but we should always include an exception. The exception is that leaf blowing should be permitted for users standing on roofs, where other methods of disposing of flammable debris are dangerous.
These machines are not needed – at all! Except, of course, if they are used as intended: as leaf blowers and only during times of the year when leaves fall from the trees.
In my own neighborhood, for homeowners and professional lawn-/yard-care providers alike, the air-/noise-polluting machines are a mainstay. And, for what?! I do the same work with a broom and dustpan which suits me just fine. My mower, incidentally, is a rechargeable electric. I remember being in my backyard and behind the neighbor’s house next door, a yard work-crew member was going at it full bore. In awe, I watched a huge plume of dirt, dust and debris come flying over the fence that separates the two properties, and further watched to see which way the airborne filth was going to go. It moved to the west and south rather than to the north which is where my house and yard are located. All I could think of at the time, was when it was the yard-maintenance professionals’ turn to groom the yard next where I live, that dust, dirt and debris that landed there from the yard behind, that this air-polluting mess would go right back from whence it came and elsewhere. This is a no-win proposition.
And, if that wasn’t enough, at a hospital I visited once, a grounds-crew-person, sure enough, with gasoline-blower in hand, proceeded to blow around the residual matter left after the lawn was mowed that could be introduced into the air. And at a hospital, of all places! A hospital is a place that promotes and improves the health of its patients. Seeing the blower in action was indeed counter-intuitive. It wasn’t that this person with blower in hand was kicking up the residue, it was that it was being done by a machine that was outfitted with an internal-combustion engine, and a very smelly one at that!
And, finally, across the street diagonally from where I live it was a “battle of the blowers” apparently. One neighbor grooming his own lawn capped off the work with so-called leaf blowing. All of the airborne crud literally formed a cloud around the neighbor doing the work. He was enveloped in the dust cloud. And, right next door, the hired lawn-care worker was engaged in the same activity at the same time. It quite literally had become a dust-in-the-air back and forth — each seemingly going the extra mile to one-up the other. I couldn’t help but watch as I had never seen anything like this before, ever!
I have to ask: Why?! Pathetic.
Time to educate the users of gas fired blowers. Encourage these folks to Use them efficienty.
I’m pretty sure they could reduce run times and speeds by at least 50% if they realized their paycheck has nothing to do with how long and how loud they blow.
Riverdave, is it OK to post your wonderful poem on Facebook or other sites?
It is time for Boards of Health to step up and address the serious health risks of this noxious tool. It’s time for OSHA to take action to protect the powerless workers doing this awful work. It’s time for property owners to reassess their priorities.
The Leaf Blower
Riverdave Owen
November 28, 2013
Two lizard friends set out to hunt
One bright autumnal day
They scramble through the fallen leaves
In search of insect prey.
But soon a noxious odor spreads
Across the forest floor
The elder lizard stops to sniff
And then shouts “motor oil!”
A monstrous whining engine sound
Is heard throughout the land
As leaves are blown and tossed about
From here to Samarkand.
A motor pack is on the back
Of one poor human serf
Who with his tube expels the leaves
And liberates his turf.
For some great patron Tamerlane
He moves as if a pawn
And dares not let one dying leaf
Offend his master’s lawn.
The lizards run for cover to
A hollow white oak tree
The younger asks the elder if
Now he can make a plea.
“Would it not make just common sense
To let these leaves retire
Around the trees that give them birth
And let them so expire?”
The elder answers, “Humans now
Consider leaves as waste
And fail to grasp the simple truth
Of Nature’s mulching grace.”
The younger lizard looks around
Unable to digest
The folly of the human race
Then cries in deep distress,
“Oh leaf blower, please calm your roar
And grant our ears some rest
Allow these trees their provender
Their leaves to repossess!”
It’s really a matter of clean air and sound. These toys amuse some types while providing no functional value. The two-stroke engines also spew a mix of octane+oil vapor exhaust and amplified noise. A wet pushbroom does way more with out the dust and lung damage.