Target Settles Hazardous Waste Disposal Suit for $22.5 Million

Target Corp. will pay $22.5 million to settle a lawsuit by state and local authorities in California that accused the retail chain of illegally disposing hazardous wastes to save money.

“California law requires companies to properly store, handle, and dispose of hazardous wastes and materials to avoid harm to people and the environment,” Alameda County District Attorney Nancy E. O’Malley said in a news release. “Target routinely ignored those laws to cut costs and gain competitive advantages.”

The lawsuit filed in Alameda County in 2009 alleged that Target crushed batteries, telephones and computers in trash compactors to avoid costly hazardous waste disposal fees at landfills. Target also was accused of illegally dumping pesticides, paints, aerosols, batteries and “other flammable, toxic and corrosive wastes.”

The allegations involved 240 of the chain’s stores throughout California, and prosecutors said the illicit disposal practices may have gone on for more than five years. O’Malley said each store improperly dumped an estimated one to two tons of hazardous waste every year.

When a judge last year ordered Target to stop the alleged violations, the company countered that it had “a comprehensive program” to ensure that its handling of hazardous materials complied with state law. But O’Malley said that as a result of the suit, Target has “adopted new policies and procedures designed to eliminate the disposal of waste hazardous products into store trash compactors and drains.”

The California Attorney General’s Office has said that local environmental health inspectors served Target with more than 300 notices of violation since 2001 for breaking hazardous waste laws.

Related Post:
Target Stores Ordered to Stop Illegal Dumping of Hazardous Wastes

Print Print  

Like what we're doing? We'd appreciate your support.

One comment to “Target Settles Hazardous Waste Disposal Suit for $22.5 Million”

  1. ron

    You thinkk this is bad at the store level? Try talking to a Distrobution Center employee.
    The state should look into ths also.

Leave a comment