Americans seeking healthy cities to call home should avoid Philadelphia like a toxic waste dump.
According to an assessment by forbes.com, the colonial heart of America is the most toxic city in the country, followed by a pair of California cities, Bakersfield and Fresno, in that order.
The study took five gauges of toxicity into account: two air quality measures, a water quality grade, the number of Superfund hazardous waste sites and a count of toxic releases reported to the Environmental Protection Agency.
Thanks in large part to more than 50 Superfund sites in its sprawling metropolitan area, Philadelphia took home the dubious top honors. The city also had the worst rating in the nation for water quality.
Many of the toxic chemicals driving the poor rankings have been linked with cancer and other illnesses, as well as birth defects.
Bakersfield and Fresno — along with Los Angeles, which was rated the 6th most toxic city — were mostly done in by air quality. While most cities don’t have a single day each year with an an EPA air quality index above 100, the above cities had 43, 29 and 14 such days, respectively.
Some of the nation’s largest cities were featured on the list: in addition to Los Angeles, New York City (4th) and Houston (7th) also appeared. Rounding out the top ten were Baton Rouge, La., (5th) St. Louis (8th), Salt Lake City (9th), and Riverside-San Bernardino, Calif., (10th).





What are you guys, Fox News?
Your headline and conclusions are dishonest at best. As Forbes noted (and you ignored), the rating is based on the Census-derived MSA that includes counties in Pennsylvania, New Jersey, Maryland and Delaware – including the cities of Camden NJ and Wilmington Del., among others.
If you’re living in Philly you’re not in Camden, or Wilmington, or Maryland. Philly tap water is clean and has been for decades:
”Since the Safe Drinking Water Act was passed more than 25 years ago, Philadelphia’s unblemished record for drinking water quality has consistently met or has outperformed all physical, chemical, radiological and bacterial water quality standards established by the EPA.”
http://www.phila.gov/water/Water_Quality.html
Philly air is good: they had just two air quality days in 2009, compared to 43 in Bakersfield.
Of the Superfund sites in Philly, just two of them are on the National Priority List (NPL sites), which represent the most hazardous sites. The rest are non-NPL sites:
http://www.epa.gov/reg3hwmd/super/pa.htm
Could you be more honest next time?
Yes it’s wonderful ,especially when one arives by air and they take 95n you know you are Phila.They are talking about air quality as well.
It’s not saying Philadelphia has bad air quality, it’s saying Philadelphia has bad water and lots of on- site toxic chemicals released.
you must be mistaken! this report must be about another city. We have always had good water quality and there are not superfund sites here. Please go back and verify this report as I am challenging it! Philadelphia seems to get a lot of bad press that we do not deserve. I’ve lived here all my life and the air is not that bad!!!