Welcome to Starbucks. Would you like a box of nine mm’s with your latte?
Here’s a happy thought for criminal justice students who want to be cops. Criminals with guns won’t be their biggest worry. Considering our country’s increasingly permissive approach to carrying firearms it won’t be long before every time that citizens come into conflict at least one will be armed.
Concealed carry was a privilege reserved for cops and a handful of other professionals, like couriers, who could demonstrate a pressing need. No longer. Thanks to politicians eager to curry favor with the NRA (or avoid becoming its target) packing heat has become an inalienable right. At present forty states allow citizens to carry concealed weapons, with a full thirty-six being “shall issue,” meaning that all who meet minimum standards must be granted a CCW permit without having to demonstrate any need whatsoever.
Read more: http://www.policeissues.com/html/gun_control.html#GunCrazy

When was concealed carry ever reserved for only a handful of people? Show me proof. Are you from CA?
Sorry, Dude, but packing heat has been an inalienable right ever since the Bill of Rights was ratified in 1794.
Ed, you and Derek need to look into this a bit more before expressing your thoughts. A right to bear arms has been argued since the formation of this country (and not the issue today), but concealed weapons laws are relatively new on the books and deligated to the states. The concern for police officers and other authorities conflicting with citizens, even law abiding ones, is a valid one.
The laws are new because it used to be you didn’t need a permit to carry a concealed weapon. Do you really think a law will deter criminals from carrying a concealed weapon? And as far as arguing the right to bear arms (who can and who can’t) That shouldn’t even be an issue. Its in the constitution, plain and simple. No “ifs, ands, or buts.”
Wow, nice opinion and stretch of reality by the author. Why do guns in the hands of law abiding citizens equate to a problem for law enforcement; an absurd fabrication. And as for politicians and the NRA; are you so naive as to not understand that the NRA is an organization funded by donations from ordinary citizens who use the NRA as a conduit for expressing their desires to the government. If you want to condemn the NRA as a “special interest then you also have to condemn the AARP, MPAA and every labor union in the country.
Dawn, nope, sorry you are wrong!
“Laws that forbid the carrying of arms … disarm only those who are neither inclined nor determined to commit crimes … Such laws make things worse for the assaulted and better for the assailants; they serve rather to encourage than to prevent homicides, for an unarmed man may be attacked with greater confidence than an armed man.”